<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SHERLOCK HOLMES review: where did that come from?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reelthinker.com/2009/12/30/sherlock-holmes-review-where-did-that-come-from/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reelthinker.com/2009/12/30/sherlock-holmes-review-where-did-that-come-from/</link>
	<description>spilling thoughts on everyday movie news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Froley</title>
		<link>http://reelthinker.com/2009/12/30/sherlock-holmes-review-where-did-that-come-from/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Froley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reelthinker.com/?p=1221#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Haha yeah Data&#039;s a bit hit-and-miss, isn&#039;t he? I&#039;m actually reading through some of the Holmes books now -- proud to say I guessed the final twist in Valley Of Fear about 5 - 10 pages before it actually happened. I was stoked. And yeah, the ominous introduction to Moriarty was very faithful to the books.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Otherwise I like the liberties Ritchie took with the source material, and I don&#039;t mind RDJ&#039;s portrayal in the least. Didn&#039;t consciously notice the costumes myself, but that probably means they were all good, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha yeah Data&#39;s a bit hit-and-miss, isn&#39;t he? I&#39;m actually reading through some of the Holmes books now &#8212; proud to say I guessed the final twist in Valley Of Fear about 5 &#8211; 10 pages before it actually happened. I was stoked. And yeah, the ominous introduction to Moriarty was very faithful to the books.</p>
<p>Otherwise I like the liberties Ritchie took with the source material, and I don&#39;t mind RDJ&#39;s portrayal in the least. Didn&#39;t consciously notice the costumes myself, but that probably means they were all good, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outbackscorpio</title>
		<link>http://reelthinker.com/2009/12/30/sherlock-holmes-review-where-did-that-come-from/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>outbackscorpio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reelthinker.com/?p=1221#comment-271</guid>
		<description>In answer to your question, nope, not consciously. &lt;br&gt;I find Data&#039;s Sherlock Holmes characterisation enormously like fingernails down a blackboard. I prefer to not be reminded of it...!&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;I REALLY hadn&#039;t expected the female characters to be as good as they were. Mary - Kelly Reilly worked well, as did the costuming. Holmes ratty full length coat was an inspiration. At last a Holmes who looked like he took drugs!!&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;I have read Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. His books SOLD as did Agatha Christie as a result of good publishers making people think they COULD solve the mystery! (but almost impossible when you are NOT given enough detail) Clever marketing.&lt;br&gt;Conan Doyle would have approved of  the mysterious introduction to Moriarty. That was done well. &lt;br&gt;I agree with the fight scenes, they didn&#039;t gel. (random - kept waiting for it to happen again, felt like a Ritchie stamp/signature..??) Unnecessary explanation of Holmes immense intellectual abilities perhaps?&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Minor detail in the scheme of things.&lt;br&gt;Liked it. A little unexpectedly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In answer to your question, nope, not consciously. <br />I find Data&#39;s Sherlock Holmes characterisation enormously like fingernails down a blackboard. I prefer to not be reminded of it&#8230;!</p>
<p>I REALLY hadn&#39;t expected the female characters to be as good as they were. Mary &#8211; Kelly Reilly worked well, as did the costuming. Holmes ratty full length coat was an inspiration. At last a Holmes who looked like he took drugs!!</p>
<p>I have read Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. His books SOLD as did Agatha Christie as a result of good publishers making people think they COULD solve the mystery! (but almost impossible when you are NOT given enough detail) Clever marketing.<br />Conan Doyle would have approved of  the mysterious introduction to Moriarty. That was done well. <br />I agree with the fight scenes, they didn&#39;t gel. (random &#8211; kept waiting for it to happen again, felt like a Ritchie stamp/signature..??) Unnecessary explanation of Holmes immense intellectual abilities perhaps?</p>
<p>Minor detail in the scheme of things.<br />Liked it. A little unexpectedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
